1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) add “related Acts and subordinate statutes” to the “related Acts and subordinate statutes” attached to the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) refer to the entry of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance in addition to the dismissal of the pertinent parts among the judgment of the court of first instance as follows; and (c) thereby, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

Following the 3rd page 14 and 15’s “Deposit”, the 4th page 17’s “64,971,050 won (a total of 684,94,550 won)” was added to the 4th page 17’s “(664,971,050 won excluding 20,000 won for obstacles from total of 684,94,550 won).” The 5th page 14’s “(1,471m2 prior to D, as seen earlier, was divided into D sites and E parking lots)” was added to the 6th page 6,7’s “parking lot” and “the 8th page 5’s “the 9th page 5’s act directly from roads” should be “the act of the Defendant’s act of not cancelling the designation of the development restriction zone under the Act on Special Measures for the Development Restriction of Development Restriction Zones,” and the Plaintiff’s act should be objectively released from the 9’s act of the development restriction zone.

'' asserts to the effect that ‘' is.

However, the facts and the evidence mentioned above, and the court's fact-finding with respect to the Daejeon Metropolitan City Mayor, added to the whole purport of the pleadings.