1. The defendant assistant intervenor's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the intervenor joining the defendant.

purport.

1. The reasons why this court should explain are the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance, except to dismiss or add each corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance as follows. Thus, this Court shall accept it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Article 21 subparag. 1 of the Act provides that “No evidence exists to acknowledge that L had given such instructions.” No. 25 of the Act provides that “No evidence No. 1, 2, and 18 shall be sufficient to acknowledge it,” and “No evidence exists to acknowledge it.” No. 25 of the Act No. 10 provides that “No. 1, 2, and 14 shall be “Evidence No. 1, 18,” and “No. 25 of the Act (the intervenor denied the part of the grounds for the disciplinary action in question),” and “No. 25 of the Act on the Disciplinary Measures in the instant case, it is insufficient to acknowledge that the disciplinary action was issued against the same act as the grounds for the disciplinary action in the instant case, and the same facts overlap with the grounds for the disciplinary action in the instant case, including J. 1 at the time of the instant disciplinary action, for which the instant disciplinary action overlap with the grounds for the disciplinary action in the instant case No. 3 and No. 4, the Intervenor did not recognize it). 26 of the disciplinary action in question.