logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2012.08.17 2012고정759
공용물건손상등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 10, 201, at the front of a public parking lot located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on 07:45, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to the police officer D belonging to the Seongbuk Police Station C district, who was called up after having received a report of 112 that panty spanty spanty spanty spanty spanched; (b) opened a patrol car driver’s seat; (c) removed the dog attached to D’s left shoulder, which was seated in the said driver’s seat, in his/her hand; (d) removed the dog by putting the dog on his/her hand; and (e) again interfered with D’s legitimate performance of duties by assaulting the Defendant, such as displaying the spans, and displaying drinking.

2. The Defendant insultd the victim openly by stating, from August 10, 201 to 21:15 on the same day, at the detention room of the Seongbuk Police Station located in 30, Seodong-gu, Daegu, Seodong-dong, the Defendant: (a) on the premises where eight persons, etc. who were detained and detained in a flagrant offender for the same reason as the mentioned in the preceding paragraph, were detained; and (b) on the premises where eight persons, etc. were detained, who were the police officer belonging to the foregoing police station E division of the police station, were working in the detention room; (c) “this son does not only interfere with the cexe; and (d) this farp, farp, farp, farp, farch,” and “earp, farch farch.”

3. On August 10, 201, the Defendant damaged public goods: (a) around 13:45, the Defendant was arrested and detained as a flagrant offender for the same reason as described in paragraph (1) at five places of detention in the foregoing detention room; (b) the market price in which the goods were arrested and detained as a flagrant offender for the same reason as described in paragraph (1); and (c) damaged goods used by public offices by cutting down even a toilet door in the market price at the same time with both hand and by removing them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims of damaged articles;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 136 (1), 311, and 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act are applicable;

arrow