logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.10.28 2015고단1439
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:20 on September 22, 2015, at the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Pyeongtaek-si C, and without any justifiable reason, had approximately seven customers, who were in the victim and the restaurant, take a bath, such as “sprinking, sprinking, and sprinking,” and had them out of the hospital.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. Around 01:00 on September 23, 2015, the Defendant, at the same time, said “E” restaurant, expressed a large voice as “the bit of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” which was sent to the victim G G superintendent of the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station, after having been reported 112 by a majority of customers who had been present at the said restaurant.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

3. At around 01:30 on September 23, 2015, the Defendant committed assault, such as the following: (a) on the front of the above restaurant, the Defendant: (b) was asked to arrest a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with duties, etc., by the police box of the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station, a staff police box of the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station; (c) and (d) on the front of the above restaurant; (c) was arrested as a flagrant offender and to board the patrol vehicle; (d) the Defendant was fluor of the above I’s son’s son’s son and the right son’s son and the right gate.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

4. The Defendant damaged the public goods at the time and place specified in Paragraph 3, and as above, damaged the patrol car so that the front seat of the driver’s seat on the back seat of the J patrol vehicle, which was arrested as a flagrant offender and used in the F patrol box, can take the back seat of the driver’s seat at hand, and the repair cost of which is equivalent to KRW 131,650.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to G, H and I;

1. Each statement of D, K, and L;

1. Written estimate;

1. Destruction and damage of damaged parts, such as photographs, and patrol vehicles;

arrow