beta
Text
1. The defendant,
A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 113,175,00 and its related KRW 10% per annum from November 16, 2015 to April 1, 2019.
Reasons
1. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. On January 27, 2015, the Defendant borrowed KRW 120 million from A to March 15, 2025, and concluded a contract with the Plaintiff to pay KRW 100,000 each month from April 15, 2015 to March 15, 2025, 10,000 per annum; 10% per annum; the Defendant lost the benefit of time when the Defendant delays the payment of funds or installment payments at least three times; 2) the Defendant borrowed KRW 100,000 from B on February 28, 2018, to pay KRW 100,000 per month from April 21, 2018 to July 21, 2026; and 20% per annum; and the Defendant, even once more than once, should immediately lose the remainder of the installment payments and immediately repay the remainder of the installment payments.
3) Plaintiff A is a person who received each installment and interest from the Defendant five times, and Plaintiff B is a person who received each installment and interest from the Defendant three times. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, Party A’s evidence 1, and Party A’s evidence 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]
B. According to the above facts of determination, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff A the remaining principal of KRW 113,175,00, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 10% per annum under the agreement from November 16, 2015 to April 1, 2019, which is the delivery date of a copy of the complaint in this case, and 12% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date of full payment, and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 97,00,000 per annum under the agreement from July 22, 2018 to the date of full payment.
2. The defendant's argument is just a notarized act on each of the above contracts, and the defendant's argument is alleged to the effect that the defendant did not actually borrow money from the plaintiffs, but did not lose the benefit of time, but it is difficult to accept the defendant's argument.
3. Conclusion, the plaintiffs.