logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.11.23 2016고정2282
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 14, 2012, the Defendant used the resident registration certificates of stolen-doed DNA from the Cmpology division located in B of Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, as if they wereD, and opened a bank account in the name of D and raised a mobile phone to open and use the mobile phone.

1. Crimes on or around December 14, 2012;

A. On December 14, 2012, the Defendant forged private document: (a) signed the name column by means of writing on the paper of an application form for account transaction kept in the name of the Nonghyup Bank located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stating “D”, “F”, and “D” on the resident registration number column; and (b) signed the document next to the name on the paper of the application form for account transaction located in the name of the Nonghyup Bank located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of application for account transaction in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations.

B. Article 1-1 (A) applies to the Defendant of the above investigation document.

At the same time and place as described in the subsection, the above NongHyup Bank exercised the false account transaction application as if it was duly formed.

2. Crimes committed on April 30, 2013;

A. On April 30, 2013, the Defendant forged private document: (a) made use of the pen in the form of a new contract for mobile phone service located at H office located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, stating “D”; (b) “B” in the address column; (c) “F” in the resident registration number column; and “D” in the customer signature column; and (d) signed by the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new contract for mobile phone services in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.

B. Article 2-A of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the Defendant shall exercise the above investigation document.

At the same time and place as described in the subsection, the above H used the forged mobile phone service new contract as if it was duly formed.

3. Crimes committed on May 21, 2014;

A. The Defendant forged a private document.

arrow