Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, by a fine of 3,00,000 won, and by a fine of 3,00,00 won.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 8, 2018, around 02:10 on July 8, 2018, Defendant A fighted with E and E and fighting on the ground that he had drinking while drinking alcohol together with his son B, etc. and carried out drinking alcohol. On the same day, Defendant A sent to the site by G police officers, including G police officers, etc., who were assigned to the police box of the Sinung-gu Police Station at around 02:23 on the same day, after receiving a 112 report, and “Nice is responsible for police officers” to G.

The term "" was dried with sound, and dried with the balp of G and dried up to the floor.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

2. On July 8, 2018, at around 02:23, at the place indicated in paragraph 1, Defendant B: (a) committed an assault against a police officer by the Defendant, who was on duty, but was arrested as a current criminal of interference with the performance of official duties; (b) on the ground that the Defendant 2 was arrested as a criminal of interference with the performance of official duties, the Defendant met the Defendant’s left shoulder, head, etc. of H, who was affiliated with the police box of the Sinung-si Police Station, by cutting down the Defendant’

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's criminal investigation and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement of H and G;

1. Police seizure records;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (CCTV image verification report);

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act on the facts constituting the crime ( Defendants’ 1)

1. Defendant A with reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (defendants) of the Trade Union Act: Defendant B has no criminal records exceeding the same kind of criminal records or fine; Defendant B has no criminal records; Defendant B has no criminal records; degree of interference with the performance of official duties; and degree of interference with the performance of official duties, etc. are determined as above on the grounds of above consideration.