logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.07.11 2018고단1339
상해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On November 16, 2017, the injured Defendant: (a) around 23:45, at Sinsih City, and around 23:45, the victim D (the 53-year-old age) was under the influence of alcohol, and was punished by the victim’s 112 as a customer, and the victim’s defect in reporting to 112; (b) “the victim’s death” and “the victim would not engage in funeral services”; (c) caused the victim’s two arms by pushing the victim’s head to face with the victim’s head to the knter wall, and (d) caused the victim’s injury, such as the flacing of the 15-day treatment.

B. On November 17, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, and around 00:00, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a), the Defendant got sound, even though the police officer F of the police box affiliated with the Sinung Police Station E (SP) arrived at the scene after receiving 112 reports, and led the Defendant to the said D.

Therefore, F puts the arms of the defendant, and the defendant was the F, and the defendant got F to f with "F," "I am to see the f's head, f's head, f's head, f's head, f's breast, f's head, f's head, f's head, f's head, and f's head, f'.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1-b, as above, arrested Defendant B as a current offender who interfered with the performance of official duties by carrying out F, who is a police official, and left F’s hand and knife F’s hand and kn’s hand so as to prevent F from taking a lock against A, and from carrying a lock.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties related to arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made with respect to D and F;

1. CCTV images, CDs and closure photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) and Article 136 of the Criminal Act.

arrow