beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2015 High Court Decision 503]
1. On November 27, 2012, the Defendant forged private document documents: (a) at the C agency located in the Gumi-si B, the Defendant entered “D”, “E”, “F” in the resident number column, and “D” in the customer number column in the paper of the new contract for the SK Telecom Service using a verification color pen on the paper of the contract; and (b) sealed the applicant’s customer information column.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged two copies (H, I) of the new subscription to a service in the name of private document D, which is a private document on rights and obligations.
2. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place, submitted a new service contract in the name of the victim, which was forged, to the SK Telecom Agency, and delivered it as if it was duly formed.
[2015 High Court Decision 504]
1. Crimes related to joining a mobile phone under J's name;
A. On March 26, 2013, the Defendant entered the name and resident registration number of J in the name of J in the name of J, with the knowledge of his/her personal information, such as his/her resident registration number. On March 26, 2013, he/she connected his/her Lex to the computer network of the SK Telecom (M) using a string PC located in the Gu and Si/Gu, and then entered the name and resident registration number of J in the name of the mobile phone service contract (M) and the items of resident registration number.
As a result, the defendant has forged one file of application for use of mobile phone from J, which is an electronic record of another person's rights and duties, for the purpose of hindering the management of affairs.
B. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the time, and place of the foregoing paragraph (a) above, transmitted the file of application to use a mobile phone, which was written above, via the Internet as if he had been duly formed, to the staff in charge of the SK Telecom.
C. The Defendant, even if having opened a mobile phone at the time, time, and place of the above paragraph (a) above, did not have the intent or ability to pay the charges.