A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for his/her imprisonment with prison labor for night intrusion larceny in the Jung-gu District Court Goyang Branch on January 23, 2009, and on August 26, 2010, the said suspended sentence was invalidated on December 2, 201 after having been sentenced to a maximum of eight months of imprisonment with prison labor by larceny, etc. at the same court on August 26, 201, and on June 25, 201, the execution of the said suspended sentence was completed at the Kimcheon Juvenile Prison on December 2, 201, and on September 16, 2014, the said sentence became final and conclusive.

[Criminal Facts]

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall transfer or take over any access medium in using or managing the access medium;

On July 31, 2012, the Defendant, in collusion with C, established ( U.S.D, U.E, and U.S.) F at the Echeon Registry on July 31, 2012. After completing the business registration for three above corporations on August 3, 2012, the Defendant was willing to open a passbook in three names in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do nearby banks and to transfer the passbook to the person whose name is unknown.

On August 3, 2012, the Defendant, in collusion with C, opened the Agricultural Cooperative Account (G) in the name of E, No. D, (H) in the name of E, Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of E, No. 30 (H), and (Y) in the name of E, No. 30 (I) from August 3, 2012 to August 8, 2012, transferred 30 each head of E, physical card, and password from that time, from that time to August 8, 2012, to that time, the Defendant opened the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of E, No. 30 (U.S.) in the name of E, No. 30 (U.S.).

2. Fraud;

A. The Defendant, at around January 20, 2013, did not have a trade influence room in Ansan-si, and had no intention or ability to sell it at the time, and there was no intention or ability to sell it. On the other hand, the Defendant’s living cost, etc. was insufficient, selling the Defendant’s fishing to the NAV in a foreign country where the Defendant would procure it.