A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 14:30, the 293-west-west-west-ro, west-ro, west-ro, 293, operated the E Cost of the Victim F (S) who was operated in the two-lanes of the said road, with one lane on the front side of the luminous purification plant, was punished by the Defendant, such as the defect in the victim F (S)’s bicycle who was operated in the said two-lanes of the said road, a light blick, and a bath for him.

In addition, when the victim changed the lane to one lane and interfered with the defendant's course, the defendant changed the lane to two lanes, and immediately changed to two lanes of the victim's bicycle operation, and the victim faced with the left shoulder part of the victim's left side with the front part of the defendant's bicycle operation, leaving the victim go beyond the floor.

As a result, the defendant used cars, which are dangerous goods, to inflict injury on the victim, such as cage 5 cage cages that require approximately five weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. The CD screen;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 258-2 Paragraph (1) and Article 257 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts (the defendant and his defense counsel, but the defendant and his defense counsel have only a simple traffic accident that occurred when the defendant changed the course from the first lane to the second lane in order to yield the course to the vehicles which were determined after his/her intervention, and there was no intention that the defendant intentionally intended to inflict an injury on the victim by intentionally changing or rapidly operating the vehicle.

The argument is asserted.

However, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, namely, the defendant, when a traffic well occurs due to a bicycle circuit of 20 to 30 bicycles, which was driven along the two lanes, and the victim and the victim changed the lane into one lane, thereby interfering with the progress of the defendant's passenger vehicle in front of the defendant's passenger vehicle.