(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.05.19 2017고정122

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.05.19 2017고정122

특수협박

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 8, 2016, the Defendant driven a BYF rocketing car around 09:20, and driven a local road of 514 times between the Hacheon-si, Kim Jongcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, according to the two-lanes between the Gu and the Kacheon-si.

The Defendant changed the vehicle to a two-lane in order to overtake the previous cargo vehicle without using it, and then tried to overtake the cargo vehicle by changing the vehicle to a one-lane.

However, the Defendant, on the ground that the victim C (56) driven by the victim C (56) driving at one lane, failed to yield the 4.5 ton of the cargo, and that the above cargo vehicle driven by the victim was changed to a two-lane, the Defendant overtaken the vehicle by using one lane, and then changed to a two-lane, followed the vehicle by using one lane, and obstructed the course of the said cargo vehicle by reducing the speed, and subsequently, the victim changed to a one lane, followed the two-lane, thereby preventing the course of the said cargo from driving, and then the victim changed to a one lane, thereby preventing the course of the said cargo from driving.

Accordingly, the defendant carried a dangerous object, and threatened the victim with the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph damaged vehicles by cutting booms;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act, Articles 283(1) and 283 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines concerning the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment Order is a minor reason that the Defendant was aware that the Defendant did not allow the Defendant to overtake the vehicle driving, and thus, was taking a so-called retaliation by means of sudden operation before the damaged vehicle and driving glass, etc., and the crime is not bad in light of the substance and method of the crime.

The same driving of retaliation as the crime of this case shall interfere with traffic, and shall be the other party.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2021.02.03 2021고정14

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2021.01.15 2020고정390

-부산지방법원 2017.01.25 2016고단6787

-울산지방법원 2018.05.03 2018고단626

-서울북부지방법원 2016.06.02 2015노2237