1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant C is the doctor of the E Hospital located in Si interest-si D (hereinafter “instant hospital”), and the defendant B is the person who operates the said hospital.

The Plaintiff is a patient who received surgery from Defendant C at the instant hospital.

B. (1) On October 21, 2010, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by G Hospital located in F at Sinh City, that “the scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopic scopical scopical scopical scopical scopic scopical scopical scopic sc

3) On March 21, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) from Defendant C, the light-fluoral surgery (a fluoral surgery to refluorate the light string; hereinafter “third surgery”); and (b) all of the first, second, and third operations, the Plaintiff called the “instant surgery”.

[Reasons for Recognition] was enforced. [Ground for Recognition] The absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including each number; Gap evidence Nos. 7; the result of the request for the examination of medical records to the director of the Gyeonghee University Hospital; the result of the request for the examination of the medical records to the director of the Gyeonghee University Hospital; the result of the request for the examination of the body to the director of the Y

2. In implementing the instant surgery, Defendant C, by failing to perform his/her duty of care in the medical field, caused the Plaintiff’s damage, dyssis damage, spinal brate damage, and spine vertebrate damage, and caused the Plaintiff’s side effects and aftermathy, which are medicines frequently generated from the side effects and the case of aftermathy, and caused the Plaintiff’s physical function by prescribing approximately eight months to form parts of the physical function, heat, rupture, and fry, etc.

In addition, Defendant C and the medical professionals of the instant hospital did not explain to the Plaintiff at the time of the instant surgery, etc.