1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is a patient who was performed an operation, such as splateing, by the defendant at C Hospital operated by the defendant (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Hospital").

The plaintiff suffered from a chronic disease during the instant first surgery and therapy. On June 8, 2011, the plaintiff was suffering from a chronic disease in his/her usual and urine, and was subject to physical therapy at another hospital. On December 7, 2011, the plaintiff appealed from urgical and urgical hospital.

On December 13, 2011, the Defendant Hospital conducted the MRI test to the Plaintiff, and diagnosed the Plaintiff’s “scopical signboards escape, verteblopic vertecopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics

On January 5, 2012, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed the Plaintiff’s artificial disc rupture and hiveropical malopological surgery No. 4-5 (hereinafter “the first surgery”). On the 19th of the same month, the Plaintiff paid KRW 7,703,270 to the Defendant Hospital at the expense of the first surgery, and discharged the Plaintiff from the Defendant Hospital on the 25th of the same month.

After the second surgery and the first surgery of this case, the plaintiff filed an appeal for pain on the part of the Ministry of Health and Welfare by visiting the defendant hospital again.

Accordingly, on February 27, 2012, the Defendant Hospital carried out the Plaintiff’s artificial disc tamping method No. 5-6, No. 3-4-5, 1,000, and 1,000 in the 1,00-5 in the 201. On March 13, 2012, the Plaintiff paid KRW 17,00,000 to the Defendant Hospital as operating expenses, and discharged the Plaintiff from the Defendant Hospital on the same day.

Even after the Plaintiff continued to leave the Defendant hospital, the Defendant complained of the pain and her mar, and received medical treatment. At present, the Plaintiff is receiving physical treatment from another hospital.

At present, the plaintiff in the status of the plaintiff is currently a certificate of post-competence and a certificate of good faith.