A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 18:40 on October 13, 2009, the Defendant driven a DNA motorcycle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.145% from the front of the “Ccafeteria” road located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangdong-gu to the front of the said 41 Gangdong-gu Community Center.

2. Around 20:00 on October 13, 2009, the Defendant forged private documents entered the name of the Defendant “E” in the driver’s name of the Main Drivers’ Report stating that “I, as the person whose license was revoked, confirm that the above contents were identical to the facts and, if recognized and unfair as the result of the measurement, I sign that I would not want to collect blood if you want to do so.”

As a result, the Defendant forged the part of the driver’s name in the report on the circumstances of the driver, which is a private document regarding the certification of facts.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as in Paragraph 2, submitted to F of the police officer F a false report on the circumstantial statement of the driver who was forged at the same time and place as in Paragraph 2, and exercised it.

4. On October 13, 2009, the Defendant: (a) investigated the suspect at the traffic survey office of the above Gangseo Police Station; and (b) stated the suspect interrogation protocol’s disturbance and the confirmation column of investigation process in the column of the person who made the statement of suspect interrogation and the confirmation column of investigation process.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

5. The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in Paragraph 4, submitted the suspect interrogation protocol whose signature was forged and the written confirmation of the investigation process to F police officers F, who may know of the fact, as if they were genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. A police interrogation protocol of the accused (including a written confirmation of investigation process);

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. H. H.