A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 13:50 on April 27, 2015, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven a B observer car under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.062% in a section of approximately 500 meters from the front of a restaurant in the vicinity of a high school located in the Cheongju-si, a considerable amount of Cheongju-si, to the front of the original stude Park located in the same Gu.

2. At around 14:06 on the same day, the Defendant stated in the “E” column and the “Driver’s oral statement” column in the “A” column of the written statement of the driver’s oral statement at the office located in the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the official statement of the driver’s oral statement. However,

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant, without authority, forged each copy of the letter of voluntary behavior, including the part of the private document in the above E’s name, and the letter of circumstantial statement of the host driver.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, submitted to F a police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the above police station, who was aware of the forgery, a written consent to be forged, and the circumstantial statement of a host driver, as if it were a document duly formed.

4. The Defendant, at the time and place of Paragraph 2, presented “Notice of the Result of Retoxicing Operation Control,” which was sent to the PDA terminal, and the Defendant forged the signature of E without authority for the purpose of using the signature of E in the signature column of the “signing” of the above notice, and submitted it to the above F without authority as if the signature of E recorded on the above device was genuine, and submitted the notice of the result of the Retoxicing Operation Control, which was signed by F, etc., to the above F, etc., on the investigation record.