The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that no person has expressed his/her intent to board a taxi of the defendant, and that there is no sufficient fact that the defendant's vehicle was shocked by the victim, and that the victim's own driving of the vehicle exceeds that of the defendant's vehicle, and therefore, the victim was injured by the accident of this case.

In light of the fact that it cannot be seen that the Defendant did not intend to flee, the lower court erred by misapprehending the fact, thereby finding the Defendant guilty, even though the Defendant did not have any intention to flee, such as negligence on the instant traffic accident, the relationship between the accident and the injury of the victim, and the Defendant’s intention to flee.

2. The following facts can be found by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below: ① the victim expressed his intent to cab and stopped in the victim’s wife; ② the victim was forced to leave the cab with the intent to keep the victim and knife from leaving the knife in order to open the right side of the cab; ③ the victim knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.