Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the stowing paths in the paper string of Sejong C; (b) any person who raises an animal must take appropriate measures to prevent harm to other people, such as binding the animal on the stop; (c) however, he/she neglected his/her duty of care to do so; (d) on the stop the s top the stop the s top the s top the s top the s top the stop the s top the stop; and (e) on the stop the s top the s top the stop the s top the s top the stop the s top the s top the s top the stop; and (e) on the stop the s top the stop the s top the stop the stop.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each legal statement of C and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 266 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Since the arguments of the Defendant did not attack the victim, the causal relationship between the Defendant’s negligence and the victim’s injury is not recognized.

2. According to the evidence presented prior to the judgment, it is recognized that the Defendant’s 2 marith, the Defendant’s opening of the gate, who did not leave the gate, was out of the victim’s body and 2 marith, after the victim exceeded the her body, and that the victim suffered injury as stated in its reasoning while the victim exceeded the above.

It is not clear whether the two males of the defendant had directly contacted the body of the victim before the victim goes beyond the victim at the time, but as long as the victim has been playing in the two maths of the defendant who has been in his own future, it is between the negligence of the defendant's neglect of duty of care as the animal owner and the injury of the victim.