beta
Text
1. All of the appeals by the plaintiff are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court "each statement of Nos. 1 and 3 of the evidence A" shall be used as "Evidence Nos. 1, 3, 7-2, 7-1 of the evidence No. 11-1 of the evidence B, and the testimony of the witness of the trial court of the first instance", and Paragraph 19 of the above transfer contract shall be read as "any other facts that are not included in the extension of the lease term of the above transfer and acquisition contract."
Following the first instance judgment of the first instance court’s second instance judgment, “In fact,” while at the time of the instant transfer and acquisition contract, the Plaintiff and Defendant B agreed that “If the contract is not implemented due to the lessor and the F/C main company, who is the exercise of property rights during the performance of this contract, the both parties will be cancelled without penalty (Evidence 7-2).” However, the Plaintiff paid the remainder of KRW 82,00,000 under the said transfer and acquisition contract after concluding the instant lease contract with E on June 28, 2012.”
The "No. 25-2" was added to the "No. 4 and No. 5 of the 7th sentence of the first instance trial," and the "No. 7" was added to the "No. 25-2 of the 7th sentence of the first instance trial," and "the plaintiff confirmed the above lease contract at the time of the conclusion of the transfer and acquisition contract of this case," and all "the witness" of the 5th sentence and the 14th sentence are added to the "I's testimony" after the "I's testimony" of the 14-15th sentence of the first instance trial. "At least five times clearly" in the 5th sentence of the 8th sentence of the first instance trial is used, and "in the criminal case of the 16th sentence" was added to the "The Seoul Northern District Prosecutors' Office of Seoul on March 17, 2014," and "the first sentence of the first sentence of the first instance trial shall be added to the "No. 16th sentence" of the first instance judgment.