The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the court's explanation is the same as that of the court's decision of the first instance except for the part to be deleted or used additionally.

[Supplementary Part] Following the "No. 9-2" in Part 19 of Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "No. 9-2" is added.

"27 to 30" shall be added to "24" in Part 3 of the decision of the first instance.

In Part 3 of the Decision of the first instance, the following notes shall be added to the "no proof exists" in Part 10 of the Decision.

There is no reflective evidence. Even if the Defendant considers documentary evidence submitted by the Defendant as of September 9, 2016 (Evidence B Nos. 31 through 33) after the closing of argument, it shall not interfere with recognizing the fact of title trust.” [Supplementary part] “D’s wife” in Section 11 of Part 2 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be added to “in de facto marital relationship with D”.

The testimony of witness D in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be referred to as "each testimony of H and M by the witness D and the witness of the court of first instance".

Part 4 of the judgment of the first instance court, the "J Medical Treatment Right" of the first instance court shall be applied to the "J Medical Care Center".

No. 5 of the judgment of the first instance shall be written with " 9......................"

The 6th to 11th of the judgment of the court of first instance shall have the following parts:

In regard to this, the Defendant: (a) decided to transfer D to the Plaintiff under the instant agreement is not the share of the instant limited liability company, but the share of the J Care Center located in Young-gun I located in Yong-gun, Jeonnam-gun, the instant limited liability company, and (b) the validity of the instant agreement was extinguished as it fully repaid the obligations that serve as the basis of the instant agreement; and (c) the said agreement is null and void in violation of Article 104 of the Civil Act, and (d) the purport of Article 56 of the Commercial Act is as follows.