logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.05.29 2018누51128
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Defendant and the Intervenor are dismissed.

2. The portion resulting from the participation in the appeal costs.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the part added or added below, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

“The treatment” of two (2) under the bottom of the 8th judgment of the first instance (hereinafter referred to as “written judgment of the first instance”) shall be omitted, and the following shall be added.

9. The part of the “influent circumstances” was read as “Influent circumstances,” and the part was read as “influent that the Plaintiff demanded money and valuables to the students prior to the graduation by embling the personnel expenses of the student research institute and proposing them to prepare them on behalf of the graduate papers, etc., during the course of the instant lawsuit.”

13 at the bottom of the 13th place “B” shall be filled with “B 1, 32 evidence”, and “each entry” shall be added to “F’s testimony of the witness at the trial.”

15 At the bottom of 15, the following shall be added:

Witness

According to F's testimony, it seems that there were a large number of teaching assistants in charge of teaching, but it is not enough to recognize that teaching is working for teaching assistants.

17 The 9th 9th Descriptions, “each entry,” shall add “F’s testimony of the witness of the trial.”

20 20 2. The following shall be added to:

Meanwhile, in a lawsuit disputing a disciplinary measure against a private school teacher, the grounds other than the original grounds for disciplinary action shall not be asserted as grounds for disciplinary action.

Even if the first disciplinary cause is recognized, it is not only the standard of the specific disciplinary cause but also the content and nature of the disciplinary cause, but also the data about the selection of the kind of disciplinary action should be taken into account such as the disciplinary action and work performance of the person subject to the disciplinary action.

arrow