1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases or any addition. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The term "the plaintiff" shall be added after the second 6th written judgment of the court of first instance.

The 3rd 18th 18th 10th 1st 3th 10th 10th 10th 3th 10th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 2

The 3rd written judgment of the first instance court "the plaintiff" in the 2nd written judgment of the first instance court shall be applied to "the defendant".

Subsequent to the 9th sentence of the first instance court's decision

“Third, in order to observe the deadline for completion by the Defendant himself and avoid the penalty for delay, the Defendant makes a statement at the court of the first instance that the said KRW 12,373,350 was paid to the Plaintiff in accordance with the request for direct non-performance by the Habnbn F.”

Then, the fourth 16th 16th 1 of the decision of the first instance court is not sufficient to recognize that the testimony of the witness D alone by the witness D is beyond the actual agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant at the time when the agreement between the defendant was reached.”

Subsequent to the "video" of the fourth 19th 19th 19th 19th 19th 19th 10th 10th 3th 2th 2

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.