logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.06.23 2016고단1767
공무집행방해등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On March 7, 2016, at around 22:00 on March 7, 2016, the Defendant: “A funeral service is rendered to the victim for reasons of fire in the breab sales bus operated by the victim E located in Busan Spo-gu.”

(e) No funeral services are available. At present, we need to damage the flag more.

The term "" means "for about 10 minutes, customers could not use the packing straw, such as putting the wing pole with a shaking, shaking, and throwing the gas source from the bottom, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's packing horse business by force.

B. The Defendant: (a) committed assault, at the above date, and at the above time and place, on the ground that the Defendant had been reported that he was frighting, and the Defendant did not interfere with the Defendant’s business on the ground that he continued to interfere with the Defendant’s frighting operation of the fright frighter G, by drinking booming the fright at hand; and (b) frighting the frighter’s frightet, frighting the frighter’s face and threatening him.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by police officers.

2. Defendant B committed assault, at the above date, at the above time, and at the above place, on the grounds of the above crime, that the above G attempted to arrest the Defendant’s criminal committing the above crime, Defendant B committed assault, i.e., having a part of the left part of G one time, and continuously displayed G several times of drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the arrest of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to E, G, H, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of on-site photographs);

1. Article 314(1) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Defendant A who choose to imprisonment with prison labor: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. A aggravated Defendant A: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act.

arrow