Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) reported to the customer on the “E dan” in the trade name “E dan” located in Jeju-dong Police Station in the Jeju-dong Police Station, Jeju-dong, and asked the relevant customer about the personal information of the relevant person by entering the bar bar; and (b) Defendant: (c) reported to the customer by the customer; and (d) asked the relevant person.

"A police officer faces the body of the above police officer by pushing the police officer with a large voice, and booms the chest of the above police officer by hand. A police officer used his hand so that the above police officer does not take the neck against B in order to arrest B as a flagrant offender due to the reasons described in paragraph (2) below, and used the above police officer to assault the defendant as an offender in the act of interfering with the performance of official duties by a defect in order to arrest the defendant as an offender in the act of interference with the performance of official duties. In fact, the police officer assaulted the above police officer, such as having the face of the above police officer one time and with his hand with his eye.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties in relation to the arrest of police officers in flagrant offenders.

2. The Defendant B, at the time and place as described in the above paragraph 1, intended for the police officers dispatched to listen to the circumstances of the report against the persons involved in the report, and to the business owner H in the presence of the police officer G, “I reported.”

“As the face of H was two times, the police officer was faced with the situation where the crime of assault was to be arrested as an offender from the above police officer as the current offender, and the police officer was assaulted by the police officer, such as making him/her wear a house, cutting the house, cutting the gun, cutting the gun, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties related to arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written statement prepared in the I;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment

B. Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

1. Defendant B who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution;