logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.20 2015고정4740
업무방해등
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On August 25, 2015, at around 01:00, the Defendant interfered with the business of “E” operated by the victim victim D in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, where seven women’s fluor and fluor are under drinking, while drinking at the “E” business, the Defendant interfered with the business of “E” operated by the victim by force by putting about 20 minutes of a fluoral boom, alcohol, alcohol, and fluor, fluoring the table by drinking.

B. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above date, at the above place, and in order to receive a notice of personal information from F Speaker G belonging to the Maak Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 as to the foregoing interference with the above duties, the Defendant “Death or discarded,” and the Defendant is the death of

“Along with the 112 Report Work, G interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 Report Work by putting both arms and posts of G and putting them into their head.

2. Defendant B was arrested by the police officers dispatched for the foregoing reason by Defendant B at the time, time, and place of paragraph 1-b, and the Defendant was arrested by the police officers dispatched for the foregoing reason, and the above G was arrested.

The 112 reporting duty of G was interfered with legitimate performance of public duties in relation to the handling of the reporting duty of G by threatening, as we can see that we will see the desire of "Ieman Zeman Ha" and "Ieman Zeman Ze" by pushing G in both hands and stop the face of G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) and Article 136(1) (the point of interference with the operation of official duties) of the Criminal Act, Defendant B who choose each fine: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines;

1. A aggravated criminal defendant: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow