A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 22, 2016, the Defendant reported sexual traffic in the “E Multilater” of the victim D operation in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon.

The sound booker has changed to the customer "h, I have been doing so. I have been working for the customer.

“A sound, etc.” has interfered with the multiple functions of the victim by force for a period of one hour.

2. On November 2016, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s multiple functions by force, such as continuing to install a locked door, and eventually closing the business, from the victim’s G operation “H multilateral” located in the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Incheon. The Defendant obstructed the victim’s multiple functions by force.

3. On November 2016, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s multiple functions by force by force between 20 minutes, such as: (a) the victim J’s “K” in the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon; (b) the victim, who was demanded a coffee value from the victim; and (c) the victim, who was able to demand a coffee value from the victim; and (d) the customer, who was outside of the business place, got the customer out of the business place.

4. On December 2016, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s multiple functions by force by 30 minutes, such as: (a) the victim’s “NDam” in the Incheon Seo-gu L, Incheon; (b) the victim received a demand for coffee value from the injured party; and (c) the victim “Sym hym hym hym hym hym hym hym hym hym hym hym hym hyms

5. On December 20, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force of 30 minutes, such as the victim’s “P” restaurant operated in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and the victim’s drinking while drinking alcohol, with the absence of special reasons. The Defendant collected the main electronics located therein, and caused customers to go out of the business place, and thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of M, G, D, J and P

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 314 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, and Article 38.