Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On July 30, 2008, the Defendant issued a receipt, receipt, receipt, receipt, and receipt, “E, the receipt, July 30, 2008, and D return,” using a tampial tampine, which was accompanied by the E’s name, and affixed E seal.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a receipt in the name of E, a private document concerning a certificate of fact.

B. On the date of 2010, the Defendant, using a white-style pen on the white paper at a place in the Buddhist and French name on the date of 2010, stated, “Receipt and Ma-type D, instead of Ma-type D, received KRW 5 million on October 27, 2009, KRW 10/29, KRW 100”, “1/420,000, KRW 1/1170”, “1/1350”, “1/1350”, “1/150”, “150, 1/221,300,000 won, and KRW 60,000,000,000 won on the receipt, receipt, E, and D”, and marked a seal attached to E’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a receipt in the name of E, a private document concerning a certificate of fact.

2. On March 8, 2010, the Defendant submitted the forged receipt 2 as evidence as if it were a document duly formed, and held it respectively, at the 4st team office of the Korea Shipping Station in Busan Metropolitan City, the Korea Shipping Station Economic Team in Busan Metropolitan City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of C and E;

1. Making entries of each forged receipt, and applying the existing Acts and subordinate statutes thereof;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of view in the private document) and Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (a punishment stipulated in the holding of the relevant investigative document at the same time as the crimes of uttering of each of the above investigative document, and as the crimes are heavier than the crimes)

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act are applicable;