logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.8.11.선고 2016고단5453 판결
업무방해
Cases

2016 Highest 5453 Business Interference

Defendant

A

Prosecutor

Chinese-style (prosecution) and court-end (public trial)

Imposition of Judgment

August 11, 2017

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

At around 09:00 on August 29, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the banking services, such as the exchange of victims, for about 10 minutes by force, on the ground that: (a) the victim D, who is an employee of a bank, has reported the name of the application for the exchange and confirmed that “Acsp6Mb” is “Isp?” while exchanging RUB, Ry6Mb, within RUB, and RUB, within RUB, and Ry6Mb; and (b) the victim D, who is an employee of a bank, has reported the name of the application for the exchange.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant’s legal statement

1. Each statement made to D and E;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (number 4), photographs and video output materials; and

1. Relevant laws and the choice of punishment for the crime;

Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act The reason for sentencing

[Scope of Recommendation Form 1 (Interference with Business)

【Special Convicted Person】

Scope of sentence comparison between applicable sentences and recommended types: Six months to one year and six months;

【Determination of Sentence】

In addition to the criminal records of interference with business, the defendant committed the crime of this case during the suspended execution period due to his previous criminal records of the same type of interference with business, and the abusive, insult, or attack against emotional laborers (e.g., e., g., e., e., e., g., e., e., g., e., e., g., e., g., e., g., e., e., g., e., e., e., e., e., e.,

Judges

Judges Song-ho

arrow