1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the liability for damages are as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where the "this court" in Part 5 of Part 3 is "the court of first instance" as "the court of first instance". Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the scope of liability for damages are as follows: (a) this Court shall dismiss “this Court” in Section 16 of Chapter 3 as “Court of First Instance and Court of Court of Court of Court of Court of Court of Court of Court of Court of Court of Court of Court of Court”; (b) 4 9 , 4 14 , 5 , 5 , 10 , 5 5 , 21 , 6 , 3 , 5 , 10 , 10 , 10 , and 20 , 20 , 3 , 10 , 20 , 10 , and 20 , 3

[Attachment 4-9 (Real Income Part) : Calculation 4-Attachment 9 (Real Income Part 4): 52,780,905 as stated in the “actual income” column of the attached amount of damages calculation sheet shall be 52,780,905, respectively, and 4-14 through 5-10.

In the future, treatment cost 1) Mental health department: Pharmacologic treatment, mental treatment, examination, etc. for two years from January 31, 2016, which is the date of physical examination of a political party, is required. The cost requires 503,335 won each year for pharmacologic treatment, 231,90 won for mental treatment and retreatment, 915,37 won for a prosecutor, 915,650,612 won, and there is no evidence to prove that the cost has been paid before the date of the closing of the trial. Thus, it is deemed that the expenses have been paid after receiving the same treatment from June 17, 2016 to January 30, 2018, which is the day following the date of the closing of the trial of the political party. 2,761,638 won as stated below:

D. An opening expense 1) An opening expense: A opening expense is deemed necessary for one adult female at one hour a day from January 12, 2013 to February 5, 2036, taking into account various circumstances, such as the Plaintiff’s age, the part and degree of the rear disability, and the outlines: