beta
Text
1. Defendant A, C, and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months.
However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant A, and .
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A, B, C, D, E, and F co-defendants conspired to acquire gains from resale by purchasing documents necessary for the application for special supply from persons with disabilities who have no actual intent and ability to sell apartment units, and selling apartment units in the name of the disabled.
According to the above public offering, Defendant A and B issued each document necessary for filing an application for sale, such as a resident registration certificate, certificate of personal seal, family relation certificate, certificate of disabled person, etc., to the effect that, around November 27, 2013, Defendant A and B stated 38 disabled persons in attached Table 1, including K, “to lend the name in the name of the applicant for apartment sale, give the payment, and to give a part of the proceeds from resale when the prize is won.”
Defendant
C, D, E, and F used the above documents delivered from Defendant A and B, and applied for the special supply of disabled persons to the apartment of “slick Dok-ro” located in the Mandong-dong, Busan.
Defendant
C In the above application, eight persons with disabilities listed in attached Table 1, including K, were awarded the winning of eight persons with disabilities in attached Table 1, and the rights were resold to eight persons with the resale price indicated in attached Table 1, including L.
As a result, the Defendants provided a house built and supplied by the Housing Act to the transferee of the resale by fraud or other improper means, and interfered with the fair selection of occupants by the victim's lot construction, which constructed and supplied the above apartment house, as a deceptive scheme.
2. Defendants A, C, D, E, and F conspired to acquire gains from resale by purchasing documents necessary for the application for special supply from persons with disabilities who have no actual intent and ability to sell apartment units, and selling apartment units in the name of the disabled.
According to the above public offering, Defendant A has lent the name of 27 persons with disabilities indicated in attached Table 2, including M, around February 11, 2014.