A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 4364]

1. On November 16, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at around 01:46 on the street in front of the D District of the Gu Government Police Station D Special Metropolitan City, G, and Dong-si, which sought to discover the foregoing and issue a notice of payment of a penalty for ordinary crimes, and assault the Eman belonging to the above Eman belonging to the said district group, “I am to be known as C. C. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s.s. to the face.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties to maintain order through police officers' notice of payment of penalty for minor crimes.

2. In the course of assaulting a police officer at the same time and place as above paragraph (1) above, the Defendant: (a) landed a portable printer used to issue a notice of payment of penalty for light crime, which he saw as his hand; (b) caused the damage to public goods to fall into the ground; and (c) caused the repair cost to go off from the ground.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

[2015 Highest 4452]

1. On October 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was proceeding at the bank of the government police station located in the jurisdiction of the government police station, where the Defendant, at around 00:00 on October 25, 2015, intends to cross the road from the G convenience point in front of the G convenience point located in the city of the government, to the private bank.

Since H Driving No. 15, as the bus could not cross the road, it prevents the bus from crossing, “I am feascen, opening door,” the bus front door and the driver’s seat glass are parked in drinking, and it obstructed the course of the bus and the vehicle behind the bus, about 15 minutes, since it is not front of the bus.

2. The Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties was taken by the police officer upon receiving a report at the place specified in paragraph 1 at the same time and time, in order to evidence the scene of this case by the police officer J., the Defendant was justifiable in relation to the criminal investigation of the said police officer, such as “the deletion and opening of flapse fecule” and “the victim’s flapse flaps, and shakeing flaps.”