The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal lies in credibility of the statements and statements made by the victim and his guardian, and the act as stated in the facts charged by the defendant A constitutes physical and mental abuse under the Child Welfare Act, but the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts that affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the child care teacher of the sight team B located in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, and the defendant B (representative E) is a juristic person with the purpose of child care, and the victim F (F, 6 years old), the victim G (V, 7 years old), and the victim H (V, 5 years old) committed by the defendant A in the instant case.

Defendant

A1) In springing around 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim G’s grandchildren on the grounds that it is not good for the victim G to take lessons, such as the victim G to the other originals, at the flood conference classroom on the second floor above the spring level, and that it is not good for the victim G to take the hand, and the Defendant dives over several times in his hand.

B) On the ground that the Defendant committed assault against the victim F, etc. on the ground that it is not good to teach the victim F, such as that the victim F was not in a proper magazine in B B, the Defendant committed assault on his hand on the ground that the victim F, etc. was cut off, the shouldered, and the Defendant was not in a toy order before a toy ceremony was taken off. Accordingly, the Defendant committed physical abuse against the victim, who is a child. 2) around the spring of 2014, the Defendant did not put up the victim G in the victim G at the above absle class on the ground that the victim G did not “B” on the ground that the victim F, as an external organization, did not put the child care center at a bar.