1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

However, the period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 11, 2018, the Defendants were married, and around February 01, 201:17, at the point of “E” located in the Busan Eastdong-gu, Busan, the victim F (FC male; hereinafter “FC”), the Defendant A, who was the wife at the front of the above main point, took the victim’s face at one time, and Defendant B, the husband, her husband, took the victim’s face at hand, took the victim’s face at several times, and took the bridge in hand, and the Defendants jointly took the victim’s face, and were spambling (the need for treatment between approximately 14 days).

2. Defendant A expressed that Defendant A’s crime interfering with the performance of official duties at around 01:25, on the front of the main point specified in paragraph 1, immediately after the crime was committed on the same day as that specified in paragraph 1, and sent out to Defendant A with 112 reports for the same reason and identified the circumstances of the case, Defendant A interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation by assaulting Defendant A, on his floor, such as “this Chewing fewn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each statement made with respect to FC and H conditions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (time 7), each photograph/cinematographic output, and injury diagnosis reports;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (hereinafter “Act”) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant B: Article 2(2)3 of the Act on the breadth and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (Punishment)

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendant A), the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) of the suspended execution;

1. Protection and observation (defendant A) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (defendant B)

1. In the case of Defendant A, the first crime (Interference with the execution of official duties) (in the case of Defendant A.