Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the Defendants are above two years from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are de facto marital relations.

On January 6, 2016, the Defendants explained that “D” restaurant located in Jin-si, Jin-si, D, and that the Defendant F (27 years old) of the victim F, a police box affiliated with the Jin-si, who was called out after having received a report of traffic accident 112, may take blood samples if he/she objects to the drinking measurement value. Defendant B would be equal to C’s “Cin and width.”

(1) The Defendant A expressed his eye as “h.” and Defendant A reads the eye from the young gueste.

When "A person who wishes to arrest the victim's face on one occasion by drinking," the defendant B expressed his desire to arrest the defendant A as a current offender, "A only friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend," and the victim's eye was hackh with his face at one hand.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order, and at the same time, the Defendants jointly committed blicking and glicking around 2 weeks of treatment to the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Articles 136(1) and 30 (a) of the Criminal Act; Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (a)

B. Defendant B: Articles 136(1) and 30 (a) of the Criminal Act; Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (a) (a point of joint injury)

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of each Criminal Act (Punishment provided for in the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. that is heavier than punishment) for an ordinary concurrent crime;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution;

1. The defendants with reasons for sentencing Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order not only interfered with police officers' performance of their official duties, but also injury jointly.