beta
Text
1. As to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party),
A. As to 23,771,100/570,707,00 shares of 23,771,100/57,00 of the area of 2,276 square meters prior to Jeju-si, 1.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 2,276 square meters prior to Dacheon-si (hereinafter “D”) were owned by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party), the Appointed Party I, the Appointed Party E, and the Appointed Party J shared in the same proportion as indicated in the attached Table 3.
B. The 1,583m2 (hereinafter “F land before subdivision”) was owned by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party), the Appointed Party I, and the Defendant (Appointed Party) at the same rate as the attached list No. 4.
C. On June 23, 2016, the Cheongju District Court Decision 2015Kadan355 rendered a decision in lieu of conciliation as follows (hereinafter “decision in lieu of conciliation in this case”) regarding D’s land and F’s land before subdivision became final and conclusive.
The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed Party (Appointed Party) shall sell 395,03,234/484,398,000 shares out of the part on the part on the part on the part (D) of the land 237 square meters among the 498,990,402/570,707,00 shares in the attached drawing No. 5,67, 21, 22, 27, 26, and 5 of the attached drawing No. 6 among the part on the part (h) of the land before subdivision, which connects 292 square meters in sequence to the Defendant (Appointed Party) and E, and the Defendant (Appointed Party), E, E, and J shall purchase them.
Defendant (Appointed Party) (Appointed Party) and E, the Appointed Party J (Appointed Party) and I in sequence connect each point of the attached Table 1 through 5, 13 through 17, 28, 29, 29, and 1 among the land in D, the part (C) part of 71,716, 598/570, 707,00 among the land in 2,039 square meters, and the part (G) portion of the attached Table 6 drawings among the land in F before subdivision, which connected each point of 613 square meters in sequence to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and I, appears to have omitted the above decision as 613 square meters, although there is no indication of “the part (G) portion connected each point of 71,716, 598/570, 222, 25, and 1.
Among them, the conciliation of this case is substituted for the part (i) in the ship (i) which connects each point of 89,364,766/484,398,00 shares, and of 7 through 21 and 7 of the attached drawings.