1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as the Plaintiff KRW 48,711,357 and as a result, from September 15, 201 to December 3, 2014.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relevant Defendant C was the representative director operating E dental clinic located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dental Building (hereinafter “Defendant C”).

On September 15, 2011, the Plaintiff, a doctor working at the Defendant Council member, was performing a prupt operation (the fluoral cutting operation, the fluoral cutting operation on the fluor I, the fluoral cutting operation on the fluor prize), and the chinal surgery.

B. Around June 8, 2011, the Plaintiff consulted the Defendant’s Council member with the purpose of correcting the euthanasia for the purpose of correcting the euthanasia, and no special treatment was provided. (2) On July 19, 2011, the Plaintiff re-enters the Defendant Council member. At the time, the medical personnel of the Defendant Council member conducted the euthanasia for six to ten months, conducted the euthanasia surgery, and conducted the euthanasia again for six to ten months.

On July 26, 2011 and July 27, 2011, the Plaintiff received dental corrections from Defendant Council members.

3) On August 8, 2011, the Plaintiff consulted with Defendant C at the Defendant Assembly member. At the time, the Plaintiff expressed his intent that “Maak surgery is to be conducted only on the part of the sphere and ophere bones, and that the sphere correction is to be completed by a general correction.” 4) The Plaintiff was treated by the Defendant Council on August 23, 201, and the Defendant Council member provided a medical treatment on the part of the Defendant Council member. If the Defendant Council member did not perform the Maak surgery, it is difficult to completely resolve the sphere of the sphere without improving the sphere and spule, and recommended the Maak surgery.

The plaintiff decided to undergo a bad faith surgery on August 30, 201 and received a pre-service test.

C. (1) On September 15, 201, the Plaintiff had been performing the instant surgery (a malicious surgery, e.g., e., e., e., e., e., opical surgery, e., e., e., e., e., e., opical surgery) from Defendant B. (2) The Plaintiff received corrective treatment after the surgery from September 21, 201. From October 1, 2011, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms that are being flud toward the left side.

3..