logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.28 2013가합42521
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendants’ respective Plaintiff KRW 53,901,670 as well as 5% per annum from February 22, 2012 to October 28, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a person who is a citizen of the United States of America and has received maternity surgery from the defendant C, who is a medical specialist of the sex outdoor department belonging to the defendant Council member, as a citizen of the United States of America, at the Dsung E Center Busan (hereinafter "the defendant Council member"), and the defendant B is an employer of the defendant C.

B. On February 16, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) determined to undergo a maternity surgery upon Defendant’s medical personnel and consulted with the Defendant’s medical personnel; (b) again, on February 22, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) opened the part of the Plaintiff’s post facto skin, who is a public official, with the size of 1.6 cm x 24 cm; (b) transplant the single mother separated from this part into the part on the right side of the two sides, who are the beneficiary; and (c) transplant the single mother separated from this part on the two sides, which reads the two parts of the two sides, as above (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

(2) At the time of combining the above public service, there were many tensions caused by excessive tensions.

C. 1) After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff was administered an anti-biotic from the medical personnel of the Defendant’s medical personnel after the instant surgery, and was used, and the medical personnel of the Defendant’s medical personnel spent 500 meters of physiological infection. 2) On February 23, 2012, the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant Council, and the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant Council. At the time of the Plaintiff’s hospital, the Plaintiff complained of the Gutoma and the donation, and the furnal part was fried, and the furnal part was fluent, and the fluent part was fluent.

3) On February 25, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) applied to Defendant Council members; (b) at the time of internal application, the medical personnel of Defendant Council members was removed from the hospital due to the occurrence of the brupted area; and (c) the Plaintiff applied to Defendant Council members on March 3, 2012; and (d) at the time of the internal application, the central part of the central part of the body at the time of the internal application was examined and salted.

Accordingly, the medical personnel of the Defendant Council removed the boomed boomed boomed, and administered antibiotics and salting.

arrow