1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,000,000 and its related amount are 5% per annum from October 7, 201 to October 19, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 20, 2010, the Plaintiff was consulted by the Defendant, who is a sexual surgery and doctor, about the control of the length of the sphere and the sphere of the sphere at the Sungsung Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). Around November 20, 2010, the Plaintiff was consulted about the sphere and sphere surgery, and opical surgery.

B. On September 7, 201, the Plaintiff was subject to a pre-service test for the surgery at the Defendant Hospital.

C. On October 7, 2011, the Plaintiff was performing a pactic surgery (e.g., mathical cutting and mathical cutting) under the overall anesthesia from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant surgery”). D.

On October 14, 2011, November 7, 201 of the same year, and April 3, 2012, the Plaintiff was provided with medical treatment and radiation inspection for the progress observation at each Defendant hospital.

마. 원고는 2013. 2. 1. 피고 병원에 내원하여 치아 한쪽이 떴다고 호소하였고, 방사선 검사 및 CT 검사 시행 결과 치아교합의 변화소견이 관찰되었다.

F. On March 5, 2013, the Plaintiff was subject to a clinical examination at the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Dental Hospital, and was diagnosed as an irregular chronology (open chrons), chrons, chrons, and humkes.

G. On October 17, 2013, the Plaintiff had been performing re-operations, such as metal board removal surgery withdrawn from telegraph-affiliated hospitals, 1 set-up cutting of music-type 1, 2007, 2000, 2000, and 2000. On February 4, 2014, 2015, the Plaintiff was performing divers and diversing farming on the right side of the mouth and the part of the mouth.

H. At present, the Plaintiff appears to be in a normal intersection relationship with the opening quantity of 49mm. However, at the time of writing, the Plaintiff complained of the upper right sphere symptoms, symptoms of reduction, etc.

[Ground of recognition] The non-contentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 4 and 5, the result of the commission of physical examination to the Head of the Central University Hospital of this Court, the result of the commission of medical examination to the Head of Samsung Seoul Hospital of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff was at fault in surgery and treatment.