1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 16,487,118 jointly with the Defendants and the Plaintiff from March 3, 2012.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a person who is a citizen of the United States of America and has received maternity surgery from the defendant C, who is a medical specialist of the sex outdoor department belonging to the defendant Council member, as a citizen of the United States of America, at the Dsung E Center Busan (hereinafter "the defendant Council member"), and the defendant B is an employer of the defendant C.

B. On February 16, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) determined to undergo a maternity surgery as a result of consultation with the medical personnel of the Defendant Council with the Defendant Council member by internalizing the Defendant Council member; (b) again, on February 22, 2012, the Plaintiff: (c) opened the part skin under the Plaintiff’s post lusium, who is a public official, with the size of 1.6 cm x 24 cm; (d) opened the part skin under the lusium of the Plaintiff, who is a public official, with the size of 1.6 cm x 24 cm; (e) transplanted the part separated from this part to the left side part on the left side of the lusium where there is no single mother; and (e) Mosing the part of the granted part to contact with the other part as above (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

(2) At the time of combining the above public service, there were many tensions caused by excessive tensions.

3) The Plaintiff was provided with shampoo and shampoo on the third day after the instant surgery from Defendant Council members, and received a notice to the extent of March 2, 2012 (a post-mampoo and shampoo and shampoo). (c) After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff was administered with sedshoo and shampoo by the medical personnel of Defendant Council members after the instant surgery.

In addition, it was written and discussed, and the medical personnel of the defendant's clinic spent 500ml of physiological dynasium.

2) On February 23, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Defendant Council member, and at the time of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff complained of Gototo and to the franchising department, and the blood transfusion was prohibited on the franchising department, and the franchising department was placed on the franchising department. 3) The Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Defendant Council member on February 25, 2012. At the time of the franchising, the Plaintiff applied to the Defendant Council member on the franchising unit, and the Defendant