logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2011.02.18 2008고정4424
집회및시위에관한법률위반 등
Text

Defendant

B and A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 700,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 4, 2007, the Defendants tried to find out in the commemoration of the 30th anniversary of the 30th anniversary of the establishment of AM, which was scheduled to be held in AL, and decided to indicate a claim that the termination of the contract against Defendant B on the part of AM is unfair.

1. A person who desires to hold an outdoor assembly or demonstration in violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act shall submit to the chief of the competent police station a report in which the purpose, time, place, organizer, person in charge of liaison, address, occupation and liaison of moderators, organization scheduled to participate, number of participants, and method of the demonstration from 720 hours to 48 hours before the outdoor assembly or demonstration is held;

On May 4, 2007, the Defendants held an assembly, with the names of NN and one influor, and between 09:40 to 18:40 on May 4, 2007, by holding an outdoor assembly report at the entrance of the above AL regularly, without submitting an outdoor assembly report to the chief of the police station in the astronomical Police Station, with the loudspeaker installed on the AO Cost World Vehicles, and by holding an assembly, such as carrying out relief to the same purport, such as using a loudspeaker to the effect that the Defendants are “unjustifiablely withdrawn”, “living wage security”, and “reresumed to be reinstated.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the names of NN and one influor, and held an unreported outdoor assembly.

2. At around 09:40 on May 4, 2007, Defendants B and A violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) set up a major framework for labor leave as prescribed in paragraph (1) of the same Article, and around 09:40 on May 4, 2007: (a) the Defendants and those of AM employees, including the Defendants and N, Q (the age of 45), and R (the age of 45); (b) the Defendants set off a line of AP and run a drinking house; and (c) the Defendants and those of AM employees, including the victims, Q (the age of 45), and R (the age of 42); (d) the Defendants were able to take care of AP’s spath from the floor of two arms; and (e) Defendant B took care of two parallels and coordinatess for two weeks to AP; and (e) took care of them for two weeks from the right side of AP; and (e) during the pertinent period of two weeks treatment.

arrow