Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

H The professor of the University AB, the professor of the Gyeonggi University, the professor of the University AC, the professor of the Korea Transport University, the professor of the Defendant G and the professor of the Daelim University, the professor of the Defendant AE and the professor of the Postal Information University, the Defendant B and the professor of the Gu University AG and the professor of the Gu University, the professor of the AH and the professor of the C Master’s Name Culture Department, the Defendant A and the professor of the Gu University, the University AG and the Department of tin, and the professor of the Seolim University AG and the Defendant E of the Western University.

At around August 2015, AI received a request from AL, a manager of the business of AJ and AK for publication of books to add professors, who are not the author, to the “AM” and “N” book, a work of the AI, and accepted the request.

At around that time, the Defendants received the request for additional defects from AO, AP, and AL, which are not the author, in the above book, from the business employees of AJ and AK publication, and accepted the request.

After that, around September 7, 2015, AO, AP, and D had been published in the AJ and the AK office located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and around September 7, 2015, Defendant G, I, B, C, A, and D did not have the public interest of “AM”. Even if Defendant G, I, C, and E are not the public interest of “N”, Defendant H, F, and D were added to Defendant G, I, B, C, A, and E to the “AM” sign, and Defendant G, B, C, A, and E were added to the “N” sign, and published the first page in the name of AK.

Accordingly, the Defendants made the work public in collusion with the above AL, AO, AP, etc. by indicating the real name of a person other than the author as the author.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of a witness, AL and AP;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect by the prosecution against AI, defendant G, F, D, B, or C;

1. Copy of the second examination protocol concerning AO, which is made to the prosecution;

1. An investigation report (AR file file file filing reporting requested in this review), a copy of an investigation report (a copy of a suspect AO reading e-mail attachment), an investigation report (a separate attachment of a false author’s lecture plan, etc.), an investigation report (a file of monetary records of A, E, H and AL, and AO), an investigation report (i.e., files of I and AL monetary records).