logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 10. 25. 선고 2018두50932 판결
(심리불속행) ‘수공비로서의 해리금’에 대하여 과세를 할 수 있는지 여부와 과세표준을 산정함에 있어 피고가 사용한 자료의 적정한지 여부[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-59781 (Law No. 2018, Jun. 20, 2016)

Title

Whether taxation can be made on nautical miles as nautical miless and whether the Defendant’s materials used are appropriate in calculating the tax base.

Summary

(C) The nautical miless included in gold received from the seller, etc. shall be subject to a full revocation by the tax authority, as it is not reasonable in calculating the tax base, of the nautical miless.

Related statutes

Article 16 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

2018Du50932 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Value-Added Tax, etc.

Plaintiff-Appellant

○ Rod

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2017Nu59781 Decided June 20, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

October 25, 2018

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against each appellant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

arrow