beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-47214 ( December 08, 2017)
Title
(D) Whether the Korea Asset Management Corporation's disposition to allocate the proceeds of the public auction is appropriate
Summary
(2) In the public sale procedure of this case, the intervenor of this case appears to have lawfully distributed the shares in this case to the public sale procedure of this case. The facts cited by the plaintiff cannot be deemed to have recognized that the intervenor had no validity of the seizure during the public sale procedure of this case.
Related statutes
Article 47 (Effect of Seizing Real Estate, etc.)
Cases
2018Du30075 Revocation of revocation of allocation
Plaintiff-Appellant
○○
Defendant-Appellee
○○○○ ○○
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2017Nu47214 Decided December 8, 2017
Imposition of Judgment
April 12, 2018
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the participation.
Reasons
The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal (to the extent of supplement in case of any statement in the statement in the statement not timely filed) were examined. However, the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal or are deemed groundless. Thus, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per