logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.10.13 2013가단62427
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 4,00,000 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from July 1, 2010 to October 13, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff received from the Defendant’s “Cental clinic” as a result of the Plaintiff’s left side pain from which he could not inhale food and drink food (hereinafter “instant procedure”) the Defendant’s “Cental clinic,” and received from the Defendant’s left left side and the left left lower walle for it (hereinafter “instant procedure”).

B. After medical treatment for the plaintiff on July 1, 2010: 37 after anesthesia, 2010.

7. 9.: the conduct of drishing on July 16, 2010 of the place of practice: or

7. 26. 26. 26: Dental launching No. 26, 27, 37, and pacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacaca

4. 6.: (a) The Plaintiff does not wish to take the treatment of drishing on September 3, 2012: (b) the Defendant issued a written opinion to the effect that the Plaintiff fell out of the hrishing treatment; and (c) the Defendant would encourage the Plaintiff to take medical treatment in the grishing department, oriental medical clinic, etc. on October 16, 2012; (d) the removal of brish scrap metal Nos. 26, 27, and 37.

C. From September 18, 2012, the Plaintiff received medical treatment in Yangsan National University Hospital, Hanwon, Ansan Hospital, and Lee Jae-in from around March 18, 2012.

The plaintiff appeal for the pass on the left-hand side of the city, within the Gu lecture, the left-hand side, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 2, 3, and 4 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) With respect to the existence of negligence in the instant procedure, the Plaintiff is proceeding close to the dental area of the Defendant while performing the instant procedure.

arrow