A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by a fine of thirty million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the main award) is a person engaged in driving a registered Ova.

On November 22, 2017, the Defendant driven the above Obaon on the 13:20 on the 13:20th day of November, 2017, and moved back the front distance of elementary school from the apartment on the side of mountain apartment to the Kimpo Holdings.

Since the place has a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, in such cases, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service has a road by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the road, and to safely drive the road.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to stop this and found the victim B (9) who dried the above crosswalk at late, and had the victim injured by the defendant's right arms exceeded the opposite side of the defendant.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant suffered injury to brain-dead in the absence of any two wounds in an open room for about three weeks due to such occupational negligence, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures, such as aiding and abetting the victimized person.

2. On November 22, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseless Driving) operated an Oral Ba, a two-wheeled vehicle without a driver’s license, for approximately 5km section from 37 U.S. S. S. S., Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, to 763-ro, Kimpo-si, via the front distance of the elementary school via Kimpo-si, without obtaining a driver’s license, from around 13:20 to around 37 U.S. to e.b., Kimpo-si.

3. The Defendant is a person who violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages.

Despite the fact that the defendant is prohibited from operating on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, he operated the above dial part, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police in relation to B.