logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.09.10 2013고정94
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, with the trade name of “F,” was a person operating a licensed real estate agent’s office. G, one of its customers, concluded a lease agreement on H-owned apartment buildings at the victim I’s licensed real estate agent’s office (52 years old).

At around 11:30 on August 31, 2012, the Defendant found at the “K” licensed real estate agent office for the victim’s operation in Gangnam-gu Seoul High Court, and concluded that the Defendant read the phrase “drawing contract”, “drawing off the victim,” “drawing off the customer,” “I do not leave the customer,” and “I do not leave the customer. I do not immediately see it for about 30 minutes, I am a large portion of the victim’s flick, and am off the victim’s flick, and kid the victim’s flick, and walked the flick side of the right side of the victim’s flick, walking the flick, and knicked the victim’s flick, etc., requiring approximately two weeks medical treatment for the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the operation of the licensed real estate agent office of the victim by force, and injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness I, M, G, N, andO;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine for the crime, the choice of a penalty, and the choice of a fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The instant act of interference with the business of this case regarding the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the illegality should be avoided by Article 20 of the Criminal Act, as it does not violate social rules, in light of the relationship between the Defendant and the victim, and the circumstances leading to the victim, etc.

arrow