Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 10:30 on May 2, 2014 to 12:30 on the same day, the Defendant was unable to perform counseling services for customers, who had been engaged in the licensed real estate agent office of the Daegu Dong-gu dong-gu dong-gu dong-gu dong-gu dong-gu dong-gu dong-gu dong-gu dong-gu dong-gu dong-dong dong-dong dong-dong dong-

As a result, the defendant interfered with the victim's licensed real estate agent's business by force.

2. On May 2, 2014, the Defendant was at the office of licensed real estate agents located in Daegu Dong-gu Dong-gu, Daegu Dong-gu, about 13:10 on May 2, 2014, and at the office of licensed real estate agents located in the same Gu-gu, Daegu Dong-gu, Police Station Epis, who received 112 reports and called out, received confirmation of facts

The Defendant asked F on the instant case by asking F to F on the ground that the instant case is bad, and expressed to F, that “I am k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the control and prevention of police officers' criminal acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police statement statute to C and F;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment is not only that the defendant interfered with the victim's licensed real estate agents' duties under the influence of alcohol, but also that the defendant interfered with the execution of official duties by using violence against the police officers dispatched after receiving a report.

However, the defendant is in depth divided his mistake, and he commits a crime by contingently committed at the drunk, and the degree of obstruction of business or obstruction of official business is not more severe, and he agreed with the victim C.