logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2016.03.23 2015고정593
폭행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: “The Defendant: (a) while operating a cab on the front of the D station located in Jinju City, on July 1, 2015, on the road in front of the D station located in Jinju-si, Jinju-si; (b) the Victim F (24 years of age) is driving Orab, while driving Ora; (c) the Defendant Hadodo 2 lanes and Hado Hado Hado Hado Hado Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Ha

Whether it will not turn on the job;

The term “the victim’s breath,” and the victim’s breath assaulted by booming the breath.

“The case is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant on March 15, 2016, after the public prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow