Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:52 on November 16, 2013, the Defendants conspired that six police officers, such as E and F, to verify the occurrence of the instant assault, such as E and E, and that E and E and F, playing in the singing box while they were playing, and continued to assault G, H and E and E, which were playing in the said singing box, and F, when the said G and I, J and F, which are f, with the speed of Silor, met. At around 02:0 on the same day, the Defendants continued to commit the instant assault, such as “I,” and “I, police officers, who were sent to receive 112 reports on the street before the singing line,” and “I will see why the police officers were able to see the instant assault, such as E and F,” and “I will do so by continuing to arrest the Defendant’s body without any justifiable reason.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol concerning I and G;

1. Each police statement of M and H;

1. Damage photographs related to the case, the K District Work Day, and the pictures related to each case;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to listen to statements by telephone);

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants: Imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Defendants subject to suspended execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances are considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Defendants of a community service order: Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.