1. As to the Plaintiffs’ share in attached Form 1 of the Daejeon Seo-gu Twit-gu 178 square meters, as to the Plaintiffs’ share:

A. Defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The status of the parties 1) Plaintiff A, B, C, D, E, and net U (Death on October 15, 2010) is the deceased V (Death on November 29, 1976). The deceased W (Death on November 27, 2008) is the wife of the networkV, and Plaintiff F is the husband of the network U, Plaintiff G, H, and I. Defendant K is the deceased U. 2’s wife, Defendant L, M, N,O, P is the deceased.

Defendant Q and R are those of net Q and R (Death on December 8, 2009).

B. 1) The net V, around 1965, is the land of 3,207 square meters in the Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon (hereinafter “Z land before division”).

(2) Around March 5, 1967, Defendant J, the network X, and the networkY completed the registration of ownership transfer on the grounds of sale and purchase. The registration of ownership transfer was completed with the content of dividing the Daejeon Pung-guT 178 square meters (hereinafter “instant dispute land”) from the Z land before subdivision due to sale and purchase as of March 5, 1967 pursuant to the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (amended by Act No. 3094, Dec. 31, 197; hereinafter “Special Measures Act”).

At the time of the registration of transfer of the above ownership, Defendant J, NX, and AA drafted a guarantee of guarantee that the net X purchases the land in the dispute of this case from the network V on March 8, 1959 and actually owns it.

3) On June 20, 1995, Defendant J, the network X, and the network Y are the participants of the Intervenor Q and R’s supplementary intervenor (hereinafter “Defendant clan”).

(B) On April 18, 1980, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the ground of sale on April 18, 1980. [Grounds for recognition] The facts of no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including virtual numbers, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

2. Determination

A. The 1st Plaintiffs asserted as to the cause of the claim is the deceasedV’s heir, who is the owner of the land in the instant dispute. Defendant J, the deceased X, and the deceasedY completed the registration of ownership transfer concerning the land in the instant dispute by using the false guarantee under the name of Defendant J, the network X, and A, and based on this, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of Defendant clan.

Therefore, it is true.